These proved to be valiant words. While the text certainly provided the first sense of what the final Constitution might look like, it also revealed major issues of contention. For one thing, several politicians were uncomfortable with the ‘plain language’ approach that had been adopted and many felt that the actual wording failed to reflect the agreements that had been reached. More seriously, technical advisers listed more than 30 issues where agreement was required in principle and a further 130 where negotiation was still needed to refine the clauses. The issues ranged from the influence of minority parties in the executive arm of government to the right to receive education in single-language schools. The politicians let their feelings of discontent with the first draft be known.